The bills have already racked up a few dozen cosponsors between them, but have yet to be scheduled for a hearing. This is basically saying: no more of that.”Ībortion-rights groups are ramping up their lobbying efforts nearly a year to the day after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. “Data brokers can gather your information and sell it for a variety of reasons. The proposal on Beacon Hill would be more in line with Illinois’ longstanding privacy law regulating how companies collect and store biometric information, such as fingerprints and facial recognition scans, Rose said.īut it would still be “first-of-its-kind legislation in the country,” Lipper-Garabedian told Playbook. Minnesota’s new law requires patient consent to release their reproductive health records, even in response to a subpoena. California passed a law last fall that bars health care providers from releasing an abortion patient’s medical information in response to out-of-state subpoenas or requests. Washington state passed a law in April that prohibits companies from collecting and sharing private health information without consent and bans them from geofencing locations - like abortion clinics - to obtain that data. Wade to protect reproductive health data. The bills are part of a broader push among blue states since the fall of Roe v. “People want our lawmakers to protect our rights and the right to personal autonomy and the right to travel without being tracked,” said Carol Rose, executive director of the ACLU of Massachusetts, which worked with lawmakers on the bills and is partnering with Reproductive Equity Now and the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund of Massachusetts on the “Your Location: It’s None of Their Business” campaign. But 63 percent of respondents separately said they were “extremely concerned” that other states could use location data to target people who travel to Massachusetts for reproductive care. The question pollsters posed to get those results didn’t mention abortion. A January Beacon Research survey of 1,003 registered voters in the state showed 92 percent support for banning companies from selling location data, with 93 percent of Democrats and independents and 88 percent of Republicans in favor of it. Kate Lipper-Garabedian aim to crack down on data brokers more broadly, advocates are pushing them as another way to protect people seeking abortion care in Massachusetts from possible harassment and prosecution by states that have criminalized the procedure.Īnd they’re touting polling that shows overwhelming and bipartisan support for such a bill. While the companion bills filed by Senate Majority Leader Cindy Creem and state Rep. The ACLU of Massachusetts and reproductive-rights groups are launching a new lobbying effort to support legislation that would prevent companies from selling or leasing cell phone location data without permission. COVERING THEIR TRACKS - The next frontier in the abortion-rights fight: data privacy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |